Moving the Writing Forward
I have three writer names. This is the only one I share, and
I’m even uncertain about that. As you know, I’ve been looking at the changes in
publishing and weighing up how I’m going to approach my writing career. It’s
not an easy set of choices, for all the reasons in my previous post (Changes,
Changes, Changes), and even now it’s not set in stone.
I’ve decided to keep my currently published writing name
with the publisher it’s with now. I like them as a publisher, and I’m happy to
keep that writing name with them. I hope they feel the same way about me as I’ve
been on hiatus until now. No doubt my other writing name will blog about it.
My other writing name has placed in a writing competition
run by the publisher for which her work was originally pitched, and she was
asked to submit it to the editor of that line. I’m still working on my decision
with that. On the up-side, if they publish that writer name, I garner ‘respect’
from writers who value such things, and gain the option of being published
again, if I keep the quality up. I would also receive more up front than I
could hope to make back in the first 6-12 months of self-publishing. On the
down-side that would likely be all that I would make, as the print run would be
limited, and the e-pub rates are rumoured to be below 25%. I wouldn’t get the
rights back, and I would probably be limited to one release per quarter. The
earning life of the book would be extremely short. I know, if I look at it that
way, the decision should be easy, but it’s not. It really isn’t. It goes
against everything I’ve learned in the last twenty years. It goes against it
everything, but to go forward using the traditional means of publishing goes
against the data I’ve spent the last six months gathering and analysing. And
still I hesitate. Go figure.
This writing name, my own, it’s not so hard. Fantasy,
science fiction and young adult are all notoriously difficult markets to break
into even if you’re good enough, so
it’s hard to tell if it’s you, or the market, if you’re rejected. It also doesn’t
matter if it’s a form rejection, a ‘good’ rejection with encouragement to
submit other works, or a flat-out ‘no’; a rejection is still a rejection. Most
come without an indication if it’s writing quality or just market
unsuitability, but that’s for another post.
For years, established writers in these market areas have
been saying that you need a lucky break, or a personal ‘in’ with an editor, or
an agent, or an established list of short story publications, or a successful
contact at a conference and even then there was no guarantee. Even established
best sellers who, undoubtedly, are
good enough have had rejections in these fields. Now, that’s all changed.
My only dilemma here is that I write a number of genres, and
my research indicates that I will need to write and publish a number of stories
to begin to establish a brand. How I manage to mesh science fiction, fantasy,
young adult, and horror into one brand while building it is a quandary. It’s
possible. Those who’ve gone ahead have proven that.
I’m thinking I’ll just establish one genre and then add
other genres one at a time. I’ll probably write across the span of genres that
interest me, but I’ll control the releases to cause minimal brand ‘smudging’. I
also think I can work on Young Adult works in the same genre I’m publishing for
the older audience, without detracting from the brand, as long as I make sure
the Young Adult work is marked clearly.
Alternatively, I could just write and release and the brand
will gradually emerge, but it will take longer that way, and I’m not sure it
will work. I’ll stick with Plan A and see how I go.
Now, all I have to do is find enough time out of my writing
to get my head around Kindle and Smashwords formatting, find an affordable editor
or a reliable Beta reader, and budget for and find a cover artist.
Guess I’d better go and continue that process, hey.
Comments
Post a Comment